The Tango-L mailing list archive

Digest from 7 Oct 2000 to 8 Oct 2000





Reply-To: Discussion of Any Aspect of the Argentine Tango          <TANGO-L  @MITVMA.MIT.EDU>
To: Recipients of TANGO-L digests <TANGO-L  @MITVMA.MIT.EDU>
Date:     Sun, 8 Oct 2000 03:00:06 -0400
Sender: Discussion of Any Aspect of the Argentine Tango          <TANGO-L  @MITVMA.MIT.EDU>
From: Automatic digest processor <LISTSERV  @MITVMA.MIT.EDU>
Subject:  TANGO-L Digest - 7 Oct 2000 to 8 Oct 2000 (#2000-272)

There are 2 messages totalling 75 lines in this issue. Topics of the day: 1. COMMENTS ON interaction of bodies and souls 2. COMMENTS ON CHICHO & LUCIA


Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2000 19:36:22 +0900 From: astrid <astrid @RUBY.PLALA.OR.JP> Subject: Re: COMMENTS ON interaction of bodies and souls How can one > dance and experience the" interaction and relationship of their hearts and > souls" without "interaction and relationship"between the 2 dancing > bodies...connectivity...as one.. They both make up for fulfillment and > satisfaction on the milonga floor. Rick- I completely agree with Rick. There are men with whom I get along very well off the dance floor but not on it, due to mainly "technical" problems. The other way round- a fascinating dancer who I would not want anything to do with off the dance floor is a lot rarer (take heart, guys !), but again, the feelings created have a lot to do with his technical skill. Does this make me into a technofreak ? I don't think so. Men who seriously dedicate themselves to learning the tango have their reasons. And this sincerity and the temperament that goes with it is something I can relate to. They care. They also care about the woman a lot, that is another reason why they are good leaders. All of this sets the necessary conditions for the emotional relationship Tom talked about. On the other hand, great emotions and little ambition to learn is not going to make two people into a good dancing couple, dancing with a partner under these conditions can get boring after a while, believe it or not. Astrid


Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2000 13:24:06 +0000 From: Larry Carroll <larrydla @JUNO.COM> Subject: COMMENTS ON CHICHO & LUCIA Dance classes are like language classes. They can help you improve your pronunciation, vocabulary & grammar. But it's up to you to develop your own style. It's up to you to have emotion & convey it -- AND to listen to other's messages. I share Tom's concern that we (students) get so wrapped up in technique that we lose sight of what that technique is supposed to express. To focus on means & forget the ends. Focusing on the physical side of tango is fine. There's exquisite satisfaction in the sensuous joy of doing a sacada or boleo just right. But I have to wonder about the people I see who seem ONLY to want to do acrobatics. Are they really as hollow, as shallow as they seem? But I'm not sure what teachers can do about this. Hollow people have to learn to fill themselves up. Artistic lackwits have to nurture their own creativity. The only thing I can think of is for teachers to spend part of their classes focusing on expressing emotion. And spend other parts focusing on improvisation. (If they spent all their time on these subjects my guess is that students would stay away in droves.) That at least would get the point across that there is more to tango than acrobatics, as much fun as they are. With that said, I want emphasize that (with Richard Heath) we're not talking about an either/or situation. A speaker needs both grammar and sentiment. A dancer needs both technique and heart. Body AND soul. Larry de Los Angeles http://home.att.net/~larrydla ________________________________________________________________ YOU'RE PAYING TOO MUCH FOR THE INTERNET! Juno now offers FREE Internet Access! Try it today - there's no risk! For your FREE software, visit: http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj.


End of TANGO-L Digest - 7 Oct 2000 to 8 Oct 2000 (#2000-272) ************************************************************