The Tango-L mailing list archive

Digest from 18 Aug 2000 to 19 Aug 2000





Reply-To: Discussion of Any Aspect of the Argentine Tango          <TANGO-L  @MITVMA.MIT.EDU>
To: Recipients of TANGO-L digests <TANGO-L  @MITVMA.MIT.EDU>
Date:     Sat, 19 Aug 2000 03:00:37 -0400
Sender: Discussion of Any Aspect of the Argentine Tango          <TANGO-L  @MITVMA.MIT.EDU>
From: Automatic digest processor <LISTSERV  @MITVMA.MIT.EDU>
Subject:  TANGO-L Digest - 18 Aug 2000 to 19 Aug 2000 (#2000-224)

There are 12 messages totalling 868 lines in this issue. Topics of the day: 1. Authencity, Styles and Videos (4) 2. Tango, truths and videotape 3. Authencity (2) 4. Authencity and Styles 5. What is a Milonguero? 6. Will the real milonguero please stand up? (2) 7. tango story repeats itself


REMINDER: Announcements of Tango events or products should be sent to Tango-A and not to TANGO-L. To subscribe to Tango-A, send the command "subscribe Tango-A Firstname Lastname" to LISTSERV @MITVMA.MIT.EDU.





Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2000 09:06:08 -0600 From: Tom Stermitz <stermitz @CSN.NET> Subject: Re: Authencity, Styles and Videos > > --Steve de Tejas > > Taken as whole, the currently available instructional videos seem to > perpetuate the view that the dominant style of Argentine tango is > salon in a relatively open embrace with fantasia elements, and that > tango is largely danced through the execution of memorized figures > that are based on the eight-count basic. There are a few exceptions-- > most notably the videos where Daniel Trenner is teaching. None of the > videos attempt to convey an inner sense tango--that is moving to the > music, engaging in rhythmic play, and developing a heart-to-heart > connection with one's partner. My recent lament has been the lack of "authenticity" in N.American tango communities. It isn't very good politics to criticize, and yet I have received many strongly supportive comments...primarily from women, who didn't want to be public. What is most lacking is precisely the items Steve mentions above: Music, Rhythm, Heart-to-Heart Connection. It is my belief that these are much more important elements of authentic tango, than skillful execution of the 8CB and turns with sacadas. From what I have seen most tango teachers are not much different from all those videos. To present a positive recommendation, I would suggest that teachers start all their classes excercizes in Music, Rhythm & Heart-to-Heart connection. 8 weeks of that, and even a beginner could easily navigate a crowded milonga interpreting the music and enjoying their partners (to the greater pleasure of the women). Steve reminded me in private that most people are really just doing this for fun or the social/romantic possibilities. They don't know and don't care if what they do is "authentic" or "competent". They aren't likely to go to Argentina to measure their passion or confidence in the milongas of Buenos Aires. This might also be true for the many of the fanatics, teachers and organizers, but usually they have other motivations as well, perhaps getting REALLY good at tango, making money or creating community. I'm not of the school where making money is wrong, but that could come into conflict with creating community, or teaching "authentic" tango. Tango is rich, complex and multi-dimensional. Even if their teacher "only" shows them the 8CB most newcomers really feel a sense of accomplishment just memorizing that little sequence. This is adequately fun and even challenging for many people. Many teachers approach advanced classes in the same way: show a difficult step, and let the students struggle with it until the master comes back with a key to make it work. Many of the guys are so excited to finally accomplish it, and now they can go show it to their partners in practice. Continuing down this path for years, it is very easy to get into the mind set that "I have learned SO much cool and difficult stuff, that NOW I must really know tango." The more complex the better. I enjoyed this kind of satisfaction for a while, but it was short lived. I realized that getting more competent at the steps wasn't helping me get better at tango. In particular the first half of my first trip to Argentina took me into a spiral of disillusion. It is also why my return to dancing tango in the US takes me into the opposite spiral of disillusion. That is why I started this thread, claiming that in general, N. Americans don't dance at all like they do in Argentina, and not in a good way. While we may have "fun" dabbling in the dance of another culture, I don't believe we should do so shallowly. I believe we owe it to ourselves as well as the generation of milongueros (about to die off in the next 10 years?), to really discover what the "real" tango is all about. Then we can go invent something else out of it. Tango Foxtrot? Tom Stermitz stermitz @ragtime.org http://www.ragtime.org/ragtime http://www.tango.org/dance


Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2000 11:57:28 -0400 From: Matej Oresic <matej.oresic @CORNELL.EDU> Subject: Re: Authencity, Styles and Videos Talking of quality of tango dancing as gathered from tango-l discussions, I think the main difference btw tango in US from tango in BsAs as well as in Europe is that tango in US is talked, while elswhere it is danced and enjoyed. The consequences of that fact are obvious and visible. Best, Matej http://lancelot.bio.cornell.edu/matej/tango/ Tom Stermitz wrote: > > > > --Steve de Tejas > > > > Taken as whole, the currently available instructional videos seem to > > perpetuate the view that the dominant style of Argentine tango is > > salon in a relatively open embrace with fantasia elements, and that > > tango is largely danced through the execution of memorized figures > > that are based on the eight-count basic. There are a few exceptions-- > > most notably the videos where Daniel Trenner is teaching. None of the > > videos attempt to convey an inner sense tango--that is moving to the > > music, engaging in rhythmic play, and developing a heart-to-heart > > connection with one's partner. > > My recent lament has been the lack of "authenticity" in N.American > tango communities. It isn't very good politics to criticize, and yet > I have received many strongly supportive comments...primarily from > women, who didn't want to be public. > > What is most lacking is precisely the items Steve mentions above: > Music, Rhythm, Heart-to-Heart Connection. It is my belief that these > are much more important elements of authentic tango, than skillful > execution of the 8CB and turns with sacadas. From what I have seen > most tango teachers are not much different from all those videos. > > To present a positive recommendation, I would suggest that teachers > start all their classes excercizes in Music, Rhythm & Heart-to-Heart > connection. 8 weeks of that, and even a beginner could easily > navigate a crowded milonga interpreting the music and enjoying their > partners (to the greater pleasure of the women). > > Steve reminded me in private that most people are really just doing > this for fun or the social/romantic possibilities. They don't know > and don't care if what they do is "authentic" or "competent". They > aren't likely to go to Argentina to measure their passion or > confidence in the milongas of Buenos Aires. > > This might also be true for the many of the fanatics, teachers and > organizers, but usually they have other motivations as well, perhaps > getting REALLY good at tango, making money or creating community. I'm > not of the school where making money is wrong, but that could come > into conflict with creating community, or teaching "authentic" tango. > > Tango is rich, complex and multi-dimensional. Even if their teacher > "only" shows them the 8CB most newcomers really feel a sense of > accomplishment just memorizing that little sequence. This is > adequately fun and even challenging for many people. > > Many teachers approach advanced classes in the same way: show a > difficult step, and let the students struggle with it until the > master comes back with a key to make it work. Many of the guys are so > excited to finally accomplish it, and now they can go show it to > their partners in practice. > > Continuing down this path for years, it is very easy to get into the > mind set that "I have learned SO much cool and difficult stuff, that > NOW I must really know tango." The more complex the better. > > I enjoyed this kind of satisfaction for a while, but it was short > lived. I realized that getting more competent at the steps wasn't > helping me get better at tango. In particular the first half of my > first trip to Argentina took me into a spiral of disillusion. It is > also why my return to dancing tango in the US takes me into the > opposite spiral of disillusion. > > That is why I started this thread, claiming that in general, N. > Americans don't dance at all like they do in Argentina, and not in a > good way. > > While we may have "fun" dabbling in the dance of another culture, I > don't believe we should do so shallowly. I believe we owe it to > ourselves as well as the generation of milongueros (about to die off > in the next 10 years?), to really discover what the "real" tango is > all about. > > Then we can go invent something else out of it. Tango Foxtrot? > > Tom Stermitz > stermitz @ragtime.org > http://www.ragtime.org/ragtime > http://www.tango.org/dance


Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2000 12:47:53 -0700 From: Carlos Lima <amilsolrac @YAHOO.COM> Subject: Tango, truths and videotape Matej Oresic stated: > Talking of quality of tango dancing as gathered from tango-l discussions, I think the main difference btw tango in US from tango in BsAs as well as in Europe is that tango in US is talked, while elswhere it is danced and enjoyed. The consequences of that fact are obvious and visible. < As an amateur, and a pretty green one at that (not a professional, either competent or amateurish), I have a somewhat different perspective. You will notice that the bulk of the L postings is contributed by people who teach the tango, mostly in North America. I believe Matej is one of them. I WOULD BE astounded to find actual dancing on the L. I do not expect to find anything but talk here, and tonight I am going to Fabienne's milonga, where I expect to dance a good deal and do no tango talking at all. What I AM actually astounded by is the proportion of strange talk, bordering sometimes on the non-sensical or the juvenile, that got posted over the years on this L concerning essential subjects, that is, those that need to be well thought through and understood by anyone proposing to teach and guide others in the art and the culture of the tango. I am NOT astounded when I see a wide eyed devotee brimming with wonder and enthusiasm come up with something a little peculiar, or repeat some worn out piece of mythology. This is in the nature of things. A little far-side chat of that ilk can be entertaining, sometimes even surprisingly useful; and as to myths, we know that it is not wide eyed new inductees that make them up. For well over a year I have read from the L, and actually profited from it, without even a thought of joining. Now I have written a few times, with a thought in mind going something like this. I cannot help fix much of anything, at least not now, but perhaps I can contribute a bit of talk. It is not as if I believed that any opinion changes that I might undergo or cause in others would magically make tango learning in my venue or others significantly better. Fixing talk, so to speak, does not fix much of anything else. But it cannot do any harm, so I might as well give it a try. Cheers. PS - In case it was missed, I am being coy. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Send instant messages & get email alerts with Yahoo! Messenger. http://im.yahoo.com/


Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2000 14:15:26 -0700 From: Larry Duke <auto_d20 @YAHOO.COM> Subject: Re: Authencity --- Matej Oresic <matej.oresic @CORNELL.EDU> wrote: > Talking of quality of tango dancing as gathered > from tango-l discussions, I > think the main difference btw tango in US from tango > in BsAs as well as in > Europe is that tango in US is talked, while elswhere > it is danced and enjoyed. > The consequences of that fact are obvious and > visible. There is nothing wrong with talking, as long as it is about "heart-to-heart tango", right? Or maybe there is no such thing at all, and its intellectual moorings are deficient. Let's talk, friends. Let's discuss the authenticity of the U.S. Tango. Let's evaluate the relative influence of such teachers as Trenner, Danel and Maria, Orlando Paiva, and others. What's wrong with that? What's wrong with self-promotion? Have you read my new book "From Swing to Tango and back in 60 nanoseconds"? It will soon be available on Amazon.com. Don't you realize that it takes a "tock-tick-tock" rhythm to be a "real" tango teacher? If you display no "passion", you are disqualified! What is a good test for a "true" U.S. tanguero? Who else is qualified to be called a "cholulo"? So many questions, so many topics. That's what Tango-L is for! My only complain is that not enough women express their opininons here. Is it because that they prefer dancing Tango to talking about it? Seriously, now. The tone of the following remarks is necessarily forceful, but it is heavily muted in comparison to the distortion and misrepresentation of the teaching methodolgy of Naveira and Salas phenomenon that is being perpetuated by Mr. Stermitz. It is a well known tactic that when people are confronted with overwhelming evidence that they are wrong, their only recourse is to deflect the main issues by focusing on tangential issues. The only real issue here is that there are different teaching methodologies in Tango. Mr. Stermitz recent postings are nothing else but poorly disguised attacks on the teachings of Naveira, Salas, and "Chicho" Frumboli. Whether or not he is doing this for his mentors, Trenner or Muller, is not really important. What's important is that he comes clean and admits the truth. Yours truly, El Duke.


Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2000 17:38:01 -0400 From: Melinda Bates <tangerauna @EARTHLINK.NET> Subject: Re: Authencity, Styles and Videos I agree with almost all of what Tom wrote. I understand his disillusion, as I have experienced it also. Although I have been passionately devoted to Argentine tango for three and a half years, I also got so disappointed with the level of dance that I have not danced at all in months. It is too frustrating to see the same dancers, attending the same classes and milongas, and the dancing never seems to change. There are a few men I love to dance with. Men whose dancing may be "simple" or complex, but whose dancing is always an emotional experience. But for the rest, I might as well be dancing lindy (which I also enjoy and is a damn sight easier to get good at.......) I don't want to be pushed around the dance floor. I don't want to be kicked or kick someone else because my partner was not paying attention. I don't want the man to tell me what I should have done because his lead is not good enough to communicate it. I don't want to have a conversation while dancing tango! The DANCE is the conversation.....I don't want to be rushed through the subtle, sweeter music. I want to dance tango that feels like tango, whether it's salon style or milonguero, danced in the states or overseas... If I can't have that, I'd rather do something else. And by the way, I'm SURE the men would have just as much to say about the ladies not being responsive, losing their balance, etc etc. Clearly, these comments are entirely personal, based on my own experiences. Where I do disagree with Tom is in his final comments:


Original Message ----- From: Tom Stermitz <stermitz @CSN.NET> > > While we may have "fun" dabbling in the dance of another culture, I > don't believe we should do so shallowly. I believe we owe it to > ourselves as well as the generation of milongueros (about to die off > in the next 10 years?), to really discover what the "real" tango is > all about. I think this is silly. To suggest that dancers in the US (or anywhere not BsAs) have a responsibility to nurture and promote the purity of another culture's artistic expression is real chauvenism. I may wish local dancers took the learning process more seriously, but to imagine that they or we have a responsibility to not "dabble" is absurd. People will always bring differing levels of commitment to any endeavour. The teachers may be authentic (whatever that means) and gifted, but the students will always choose how far they go. I've been told that tango is enjoying a great surge of interest among teenaged Argentinians (just as swing classes are jammed at US colleges). I don't think it's up to us in the US to shoulder any responsibility for their patrimony - and I think it's a little insulting to suggest it is. (No offense please Tom!) Melinda


Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2000 00:08:04 +0200 From: andy Ungureanu <Andy.Ungureanu @T-ONLINE.DE> Subject: Re: Authencity, Styles and Videos Matej Oresic schrieb: > > Talking of quality of tango dancing as gathered from tango-l discussions, I > think the main difference btw tango in US from tango in BsAs as well as in > Europe is that tango in US is talked, while elswhere it is danced and enjoyed. > The consequences of that fact are obvious and visible. > Well, talking about tango is the purpose of the list, isn t it? Talking is a main ability of human beeings. So what is the problem? The problem is that knowing tango as a viewer and talking about tango does not automaticaly lead to the ability of dancing tango. Beeing a good opera critic is not the same as beeing an opera singer. Nobody would even expect it (in the case of the opera). The aim is to understand what other people think, to get some new ideas, and then maybe try something out. Another thread were instructional videos. (this is, as usual my personal opinion) somebody sugested the level in Europe may be better. I don t know if this is true, since I only know a little part of the US. But I know definitely, that in Europe instructional videos are almost (only almost) unknown. I doubt there is a large use of them in Argentina. Instructional videos are interesting for those who already know, or for those who want to remember, or in order to learn teaching methods, but not for learning tango. Used as exclusive source of learning, they produce something looking like tango, but not real dancing. Happy (danced) tangos Andy


Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2000 16:23:41 -0600 From: "Bauer, Russell" <russell_bauer @NREL.GOV> Subject: Re: Authencity Dear Larry Duke, I don't understand what you are saying here. How is Mr. Stermitz distorting and misrepresenting the teaching methodology of Naveira and Salas phenomenon? What is he wrong about and where is the overwhelming evidence? Also, I don't understand your statement about poorly disguised attacks. Tom's postings stated very clearly what his complaints are. I enjoy reading the discussion on this list on issues like this and like reading different view points. Please, I would like you to explain your position more clearly and support it with some substance. Russell Bauer Larry Duke wrote: >Seriously, now. The tone of the following remarks is >necessarily forceful, but it is heavily muted in >comparison to the distortion and misrepresentation of >the teaching methodolgy of Naveira and Salas >phenomenon that is being perpetuated by Mr. Stermitz. >It is a well known tactic that when people are >confronted with overwhelming evidence that they are >wrong, their only recourse is to deflect the main >issues by focusing on tangential issues. The only real >issue here is that there are different teaching >methodologies in Tango. Mr. Stermitz recent postings >are nothing else but poorly disguised attacks on the >teachings of Naveira, Salas, and "Chicho" Frumboli. >Whether or not he is doing this for his mentors, >Trenner or Muller, is not really important. What's >important is that he comes clean and admits the truth.


Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2000 17:46:19 -0500 From: Stephen P Brown <Stephen.P.Brown @DAL.FRB.ORG> Subject: Re: Authencity and Styles I too find it unfortunate that Tom chose to add the remarks that we should preserve authentic dancing out of an obligation to the older milongueros. They already have the experience of dancing tango which should be enough. Why might we aspire to dance "authentically"? Dancing authentically is a richer experience that allows us to reach an inner tango--that is a tango that consists of moving to the music, engaging in rhythmic play, and developing a heart-to-heart connection with our partner, and spontaneously creating with one's partner as the dance floor permits. If some individuals want to just play at tango that should be okay too, just don't let them be the couple in front of me on the dance floor who insists on starting every memorized figure they execute with a giant backward step. ;-) In an attempt to put this discussion into perspective, I have combined some of the comments, including a few sent to me privately, to produce the short essay below. --Steve de Tejas Learning to Dance Argentine Tango Outside Its Cultural Milieu Many of us who dance Argentine tango believe it is best understood in its original cultural milieu. Many dancers who approach Argentine tango have no experience with the culture, however, and begin to learn tango in a cultural environment that is completely alien to the dance. That places many aspiring tango dancers at a tremendous disadvantage in learning to dance tango with any degree of authenticity--that is in a manner that would be accepted in Buenos Aires. In Buenos Aires, tango is so ingrained in the culture that even someone who doesn't like tango knows a lot about it. Many portenos grow up with an inner sense of tango--hearing the music on a daily basis, knowing the rhythm of the music, and implicitly understanding that the essential elements of the dance are improvisation, moving to the music, engaging in rhythmic play, and developing a heart-to-heart connection with one's partner. Because these portenos come to the tango with an implicit knowledge of its essential elements, learning the steps and figures can be sufficient for them to develop the ability to dance tango authentically. Those of us who learn outside this frame of reference are dependent upon our instructors to a degree that is unfathomable to most Argentines, including those Argentines who regularly teach tango to foreigners. Taken outside its original context, most available instruction conveys the view that the dominant style of Argentine tango is salon in a relatively open embrace, perhaps with a few fantasia elements, and that tango is largely danced through the execution of memorized figures that are based on the eight-count basic. Of all the available instructional videos, only a few try to convey the improvisational nature of the dance. None of the videos and few instructors attempt to convey an inner sense tango--that is, moving to the music, engaging in rhythmic play, and developing a heart-to-heart connection with one's partner. For many of us then, finding our way to the inner tango is largely a personal challenge. Trips to milongas in Buenos Aires can be helpful, as can be working with an instructor who is capable of bridging aspects of the cultural gap that separates us from authenticity. Building a collection of tango music for social dancing and listening to it regularly and learning to move it without a partner can also be helpful. Perhaps the greatest help, however, is simply understanding that because our life and dance experiences have been largely outside Buenos Aires (or other cities where tango is preeminent), elements can be missing in our dancing, as well as the instruction we are receiving. -fin-


Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2000 20:54:26 -0400 From: Larry Carroll <larrydla @JUNO.COM> Subject: What is a Milonguero? So far Janis Kenyon is the only one who has been specific about what they mean by "milonguero." (Tom Stermitz has been a little specific about "milonguera." But let's stick to the male article & come back to women later - not because they are less important, but for the very opposite reason: they deserve a discussion all their own.) Everyone else in TANGO-L has just assumed everyone knows what they mean - AND agrees with it - but this most recent round of discussion has shown that this is most definitely untrue. So let's be specific. At least, MORE specific. _______________________________________________________ First, let's settle on a minimum. Sergio Suppa's definition makes sense to me. In my own words, a milonguero is someone dedicated to tango. It's a major part of their lives; every (normal) week they spend several hours with tango. With just this bare-minimum definition we're already beginning to edge into deep water, because broad definitions lump very different people together. What about the man who goes to milongas several times a week, but only idly listens to the music & never dances? I see a fair amount of this just in L.A. milongas: people who sit & eat & drink & socialize but obviously ignore the music - talking over it, ignoring orchestras & singers, never watching a dancer unless she's sexy. More expatriate Argentines do this at milongas outside Argentina. (Most people born in America prefer other venues to socialize.) To many of these people tango music is like Muzak: perhaps a comforting reminder of home, but meaning no more than that. Are these milongueros? I would say NO. What would you say? What about the man who doesn't dance, but to whom the music is as necessary as air? Who knows the orchestra leaders, composers, musicians & bands, the lyrics, can sing the songs (though often badly)? Are these milongueros? What about other people that love tango music but aren't as expert? Are these milongueros? Maybe, but for simplicity's sake I'll just define milongueros as dancers. If that's not acceptable, I'll just stick in a defining adjective like DANCING milongueros. _______________________________________________________ Notice one corollary to this minimal definition - it says nothing about how good a dancer this man is. Which makes sense to me. I know an Argentine who was a fairly well-known milonguero but is crippled with arthritis. He can dance for only a little while without great pain, & even then dances badly. Is he no longer a milonguero? I think not. Being a milonguero is a matter of the heart, not of the body. What about someone who is an absolutely terrific tango dancer? Someone who is a professional dancer or Olympic-level tennis player or ice skater with fantastic physical abilities. A natural athlete who picks up in a few weeks or even days every one of the outward attributes of the tango dancer, including all the subtle little things that the average person takes years or decades to achieve. Who is a genius with music, has the soul of a poet, perfectly sensitive to women & their care on the dance floor. A veritable god - who toys with tango for a few weeks or months & then abandons it totally forever. Is he a milonguero? I'd say NO, at least not by this definition. And you may think this example is over the top, but I've seen lesser but similar examples a number of times over the years. And I bet you have, too. Tango just doesn't appeal to some people. To repeat: Being a milonguero is a matter of the heart, not of the body. And, finally, this definition says nothing about the nationality of the milonguero. Argentines aren't the only ones who love tango. People the world over have come to love it - more, to need it to satisfy something in them that nothing else can. To exclude them from the definition of "milonguero" would be the rankest bigotry. Larry de Los Angeles http://home.att.net/~larrydla


Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2000 23:21:17 -0300 From: Janis Kenyon <jantango @FEEDBACK.NET.AR> Subject: Will the real milonguero please stand up? Manuel wrote: >These hints to recognize the "milonguero" are pretty good in a way. While it > is true that the milonguero will probably give the right answers, this test >requires that the test giver have certain skills and knowledge: >1. you must speak and understand Spanish very fluently and with knowledge of >the particular dialect used by milongueros. >2. you must know the correct answers to the questions, otherwise how will >you know if you are being fed a line of bull? Ladies, I am by no means fluent in Spanish, but I haven't had a problem being understood when I ask a simple question, such as, "que tango es? que orquesta?" I ask the question to learn about tango, not to test his knowledge. Who better to ask that an expert? Who is going to try to bluff his way through such questioning? Anyone knows you can ask the DJ after the tanda. Mario, Federico, Daniel and others who mix the music are always happy to oblige. So don't feel that you need to become an expert in tango first. It will take a lifetime. I don't know the dialect of milongueros to which Manuel is referring. If you don't understand what someone has said, just ask them to speak slowly. >Of course, if the inquisitor has the above qualifications, she probably >knows the milongueros personally and has no need to administer the test ;-) I would like to hear from all the women on the list who have danced with a milonguero as defined by Marisa Galindo. >Oh, by the way, I've heard many women wax poetic about the ecstasy they >experience by dancing with a wide variety of partners, some of these >"ecstasy inducing dancers" were old milongueros but many were young, >attractive, skilled dancers. We can all enjoy dancing with a variety of partners, young or mature. Manuel will never understand the difference because he will never dance with a milonguero, for obvious reasons. >Funny thing, in Bs As the young, pretty >tangueras dance principally with the young, handsome milongueros ;-) IMHO, there are young dancers in the milongas, but no young milongueros. On a recent Saturday night, I saw a young girl about 15, who accompanies her grandmother regularly, dance with a milonguero, Antonio who is 64. There was no one in the milonga within 40 years of her age, except her younger brother. He's about 6. >A word of advise: be aware that there are "viejos milongueros" and >"milongueros viejos". There is a world of difference between them. I >seriously doubt that the average American woman visiting Bs As for the first >or even second or third time alone has the knowledge and savvy to >distinguish between them. I would like to ask Manuel to explain what he means by "viejos milongueros" and milongueros viejos". For years I thought I was dancing with milongueros. I was given the impression through conversation and postings to the list that the men who to dance everyday are "milongueros." But since I met a milonguero for the first time ten months ago, I now understand the difference. I want to pass along this information via the list. I have learned that milongueros do not go every day and night to the milongas. Tango is not a routine for them. They go when they need to dance. They go to dance the feeling. Pichi


Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2000 00:52:08 -0400 From: Eugenia Spitkovsky <euginas @EROLS.COM> Subject: tango story repeats itself ...The argument should be about whether one is dancing within the parameters of good tango or not. For example: are both partners on their own axis? Can they maintain their own balance thoughout the dance and not disturb their partner's? Can the man lead (wordlessly, thank you) any woman who knows how to follow, and can the woman follow any man who knows how to lead? Does the man lead with his torso, or does he push the woman around with his hands and poke his fingers in her spine? Does the woman WAIT for each lead before making a movement, or does she "baila sola"? Does she know NEVER to change her weight arbitrarily? (I'm not talking about a momentary traspie-type of weight change.) Does the man dance with an awareness of what's going on around him on the floor, and does he choose his movements according to the available space, the speed at which other couples are dancing, etc.? Do both the man and woman dance TO THE MUSIC? Linda's latest posting "hit the nail on its head" Tango story repeats itself in every city! Yes, to save face (or to make a buck) people will do anything! Some teachers tell their students quite blantly, "I am the best tango dancer in the world!", having no idea what lead is. Some say, "Milonguero? This is old stuff! Nobody dances this way anymore!" Others wave their Argentinian pasports to show their tango authenticity, although learned how to tango (not dance tango, plese note) in the USA; other yet claims his rite to chreographing tango, but has no idea that movement and music become one, if it is a dance, and so on... How true it is that MUSIC and couple's movement with the MUSIC makes tango so special, but often musicality is not mentioned by teachers in class...sad but true! Students do not know the difference. They are taught steps and combinations, that is what they learn! But those few who do not give up, sooner or later begin to understand what tango really is and begin looking for answers in "how", as opposed to "how many". At this point a trip to Buenos Aires (given these people attend milongas independently) proves to be very helpful. Eugenia


Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2000 01:20:43 -0400 From: Manuel Patino <white95r @HOTMAIL.COM> Subject: Re: Will the real milonguero please stand up? Love that subject line!! I like eminem and that little line is very catchy! Janis has no problems understanding or being understood, but I would venture to say that the vast majority of non-Spanish (make that lunfardo) speakers will never quite understand the nuances of conversation or make themselves understood by the non-English speaking Argentinians. I am totally fluent in Spanish and have a pretty good handle of many colloquial expressions of the Porteqos. I've learned a good bit of Lunfardo talking for hours with many travelling teachers in the USA and also in my trips to Bs As. My experience is that even with my advantage in language I still must pay attention and ask questions when holding animated conversations with Porteqos in Spanish. I've seen first hand the difficulties people have communicating across language barriers. Just remeber that hilarious posting the other day which was nothing but a direct translation of a totally sensible narrative in colloquial Spanish! Obviously, I'll never dance tango with a milonguero as neither the milonguero or I have any interest in such a thing, no Pichi, do not cry for me. I'm not missing anything that I have any interest in by not dancing with a milonguero. I prefer to dance with women, preferably women who can dance tango to the music and with sufficient skill to follow my leads. I am well sought after as a tango dancer by many women so my tango live is quite fulfilling, thank you. For those of you who don't understand my statement about "viejos milongueros" and "milongueros viejos", I 'll attempt to clarify. I was talking a few days ago with a well known travelling instructor and the subject came up about the tango scene in Bs As, the customs, problems, etc. One of the statements that this man made was that he never danced at the milongas until almost the end because "the floors are too crowded and there are too many bad dancers". He laughingly spoke about all the old guys who never knew tango before and just learned to dance it in the last 5 or so years calling themselves "milongueros" and generally spouting off a line of bull to whoever they could. These are the "viejos milongueros". He also said that these jokers were prone to elbowing and pushing other dancers on the floor by playing on their chronological age! The others who are the real article, he called the "milongueros viejos".The terms were coined during our conversation and seemed really quite clear and descriptive and a neat play with words too (here is where a good command of Spanish comes in handy). I apologize to the list for assuming that it would be easy to understand. Anyway, Janis denies the "milonguero" title to anyone over a certain age, I guess. Frankly, I don't care who Janis calls milongueros and who she does not call milongueros. My definition of milonguero is one who hangs out at the milongas. In the not so distant past this was a pejorative term. It has now developed some sort of cache. There is another thing that is curious, why is it said that young dancers are not good or pleasant to dance with? I've heard different from many women, American as well as Argentinian or of other nationalities. There is absolutely no reason why a young man cannot dance well, with passion, musicality and heart to heart connection. I've watched and admired many young guys who dance like that and I have spoken with the women they danced with. To the last one the women were ecstatic about their dances. I'm not a young guy anymore so my defense is not about me but just about common sense. For me, Tango is definitely about heart to heart connection, musicality and passion. I've always felt this way, even way back ,when as a young kid I listened to tango in the radio and sang along with the music. That was many years ago before I even thought of dancing tango. This is not new to me and I'm surprised to hear such heated arguments and accusations about people who are not "authentic" in some mysterious way. To me this is totally ridiculous. How can anybody who did not grow up with tango, it's culture, it's language and it's message call themselves "authentic tango anythings"? Who handed out the credentials and qualifications to people from faraway places and foreign cultures to set them up as arbiters of authenticity? I have news for some of them. Dancing tango for a few years and visiting Bs As a few times does not make one an authentic tango master. I feel sorry for all these women who cannot find good tango dancers right here in the USA. I also feel sorry for all the unhappy people over the sad state of tango in the USA. Neither is likely to ever find solace, happiness or fulfillment in their tango because the tango feeling comes from inside and not from external sources. I would invite all these unfulfilled ladies to come to Atlanta and dance with our fine dancers both young and older. I would suggest they come to our milongas where they can see people dancing tango with all of their feelings and musicality. I'm sure that Atlanta is not unique. I'm sure that good tango is available all over the USA and much of the world. I would suggest that you all open your hearts to the tango and to the people who are loving and enjoying tango all around you. I want to extend my best wishes to all those people out there who are working hard to organize tango groups everywhere and who are teaching all they know to others. They are doing what is right and good for Argentine tango. I think these people deserve better than to be called incompetent fakes and worse. Besides a few *full time* teachers and organizers, most tango instructors and organizers are doing it for the love of tango and the vast majority, like me, hold full time jobs in our professions to help support our "tango habits" :-) Oh yeah, if anybody is really sick and tired of the tango in the USA, I suggest a long visit in Bs As or just find another diversion. Tango will get much better, much faster without the bitching, bellyaching, name calling and posturing. Do your best and help to improve things. "it's better to light a candle that to curse the darkness" Cheers, Manuel


End of TANGO-L Digest - 18 Aug 2000 to 19 Aug 2000 (#2000-224) **************************************************************