The Tango-L mailing list archive

Digest from 4 Oct 1999 to 5 Oct 1999





Reply-To: Discussion of Any Aspect of the Argentine Tango          <TANGO-L @MITVMA.MIT.EDU>
To: Recipients of TANGO-L digests <TANGO-L @MITVMA.MIT.EDU>
Date:     Tue, 5 Oct 1999 03:00:05 -0400
Sender: Discussion of Any Aspect of the Argentine Tango          <TANGO-L @MITVMA.MIT.EDU>
From: Automatic digest processor <LISTSERV @MITVMA.MIT.EDU>
Subject:  TANGO-L Digest - 4 Oct 1999 to 5 Oct 1999 (#1999-25)

There are 10 messages totalling 371 lines in this issue. Topics of the day: 1. PIROPOS (3) 2. Ebert review (3) 3. [ATOF] Popular culture and dance (2) 4. [Fwd: Radio Tango] 5. Argentine "culture"


Date: Mon, 4 Oct 1999 08:02:09 EDT From: Mitchell Levitan <WEDRIVEN @AOL.COM> Subject: PIROPOS A New York construction worker was known to say to women passing on the street, "Hey, baby, you so tasty, I'd like to have you for lunch, y'know what I mean?" He didn't tango, nor did she. His cousin from Jersey did tango once, a long long time ago and her brother once ate Ben & Jerry's "dulce de leche" ice cream ... My point is the list is supposed to be about tango, but maybe that's not enough. The vanishing social mores of Buenos Aires, while mildly intriguing are not the point here or am I missing the point? Mitchell


Date: Mon, 4 Oct 1999 16:57:11 +0200 From: Virginia Gift <vgift @IBM.NET> Subject: Ebert review Dear List Members, I'm still trying to unravel the mystery of this dance. In a review of the film "Tango", Roger Elbert wrote the following, but without any support "The tango is based on suspicion, sex and insincerity. It is not a dance for virgins. It is for the wounded and the wary." I find it interesting but am not quite sure what to make of it. Does anyone agree with him? If so, why? Disagree? Any comments? Virginia


Date: Mon, 4 Oct 1999 18:49:02 +0200 From: Natarajan Balasundara <rajan @EMC.COM> Subject: Re: Ebert review As always, an expert one field may not be an expert in all fields (s)he may wish to comment upon. Roger Ebert, as long as he was only commenting on the movie, should be taken seriously(although one can not assume he would be correct even then-- A Siskel might disagree/roll in his grave;-). But, if he says something about tango, it should be given as much weight as one would give to anyone -- but not more. "it is for the wounded and the weary" I would modify as "it is for those who have been through life". That is to say that it is similar to a folksong where one is merely trying to roughly put into dance what one has already gone through(episodic)-- as opposed to it being an 'artistic creation' where one might stage-manage all episodes to neatly order them as a manifestation of one grand eternal brightly burning beacon of truth(albeit what are seen are only broken dimgray patches on the ripply river of life ;-). My guess is, it maybe for the "wounded and the weary" because it looks inwardly(partners at times seem to be looking at nothing at all, not even the other person. May be they are dancing as one where there is no 'other' person or may be they are just lost in their ownselves , their own griefs), dancing down under in the dim-lights. As opposed to the "joyous and the happy", who would perhaps be dancing viennese waltz in the spotlight to the audience of a king. (But, competition may change all that.) rajan.


Original Message----- From: Virginia Gift <vgift @ibm.net> To: TANGO-L @mitvma.mit.edu <TANGO-L @mitvma.mit.edu>

Date: Monday, October 04, 1999 5:26 PM Subject: Ebert review >Dear List Members, > I'm still trying to unravel the mystery of this dance. > In a review of the film "Tango", Roger Elbert wrote the following, but >without any support > "The tango is based on suspicion, sex and insincerity. It is not a >dance for virgins. It is for the wounded and the wary." > I find it interesting but am not quite sure what to make of it. Does >anyone agree with him? If so, why? Disagree? Any comments? > >Virginia >


Date: Mon, 4 Oct 1999 11:51:56 -0500 From: Tom Ronquillo <chitiger @MAIL.DAVE-WORLD.NET> Subject: Re: PIROPOS Mitchell Levitan wrote: > > A New York construction worker was known to say to women passing on the street, "Hey, baby, you so tasty, I'd like to have you for lunch, y'know what I mean?" > He didn't tango, nor did she. His cousin from Jersey did tango once, a long long time ago and her brother once ate Ben & Jerry's "dulce de leche" ice cream ... > > My point is the list is supposed to be about tango, but maybe that's not enough. The vanishing social mores of Buenos Aires, while mildly intriguing are not the point here or am I missing the point? > > Mitchell To Mitchell and others weary of piropos: For some individuals, the study of tango often includes aspects of Argentine culture other than simply dance steps. The social mores of Buenos Aires are somewhat linked to the character of the dance. Piropos are merely one facet of the much vaunted Latin mystique. Isn't this mystique part of the imagery that lures people to tango instead of polka? Technical discussions of whether a toe or a heel lead is acceptable are important, but we shouldn't forget that the spirit of tango was shaped by more than physical technique alone. Now, speaking of cultural enrichment, if anyone has a good asado recipe to share I'd love to have it. Better send it to me privately though; I don't want to get the vegetarians on the list riled. And for any Cubanos I might have offended earlier, I'd like your recipe for Moros y Cristianos. Tom (El Tigre) Ronquillo


Date: Mon, 4 Oct 1999 15:42:03 -0700 From: Manuel Patino <white95r @HOTMAIL.COM> Subject: Re: PIROPOS When speaking piropos does one turn slightly to ones left or right? Or maybe look straight into the receivers eyes? How about the lips, should they move forcefully and plainly or more "stealhthily". Also, as one moves towards the receiver of the piropo, does one lead with the toes or the heels? Conversely, as the "piropee" walks away cooly and pointedly ignoring the "piroper", does she lead with the toes or the heels? How about the posture will the lean forward or maintain her own balance? My, my, there is a lot of questions that come up on this subject. Goodness, what if the "piroper" uses a "fantasia" piropo and the woman only likes "milonguero" style piropos? Which are the "true" piropos? those uttered by the educated and well spoken or those in the must vulgar lunfardo? Please, please let's shed some light on these important questions lest we be left lost and unguided in the dangerous real of words (particularly Spanish words). I wait anxiously on the discussion of these important questions. Manuel el "chulla" Quiteqo a la muchacha "Que lindas tazas de te al reves!"


Original Message ----- From: Tom Ronquillo <chitiger @MAIL.DAVE-WORLD.NET> Sent: Monday, October 04, 1999 9:51 AM Subject: Re: PIROPOS > Mitchell Levitan wrote: SNIP > > My point is the list is supposed to be about tango, but maybe that's not enough. The vanishing social mores of Buenos Aires, while mildly intriguing are not the point here or am I missing the point? > > > > Mitchell > > To Mitchell and others weary of piropos: > > For some individuals, the study of tango often includes aspects of > Argentine culture other than simply dance steps SNIP Technical discussions of whether a toe or a heel lead is > acceptable are important, but we shouldn't forget that the spirit of > tango was shaped by more than physical technique alone.


Date: Mon, 4 Oct 1999 17:36:17 -0400 From: Christina Burtis <Cburtis @IFC.ORG> Subject: Re: [ATOF] Popular culture and dance He's definitely missing the point, Sergio. I loved your discussions on Argentine culture, esp. the ones about piropos of course. I found it very VERY relevant to the feeling of tango. Please keep them coming. Kind regards, Christina Burtis (a.k.a. Melenita de Oro) Washington D.C.


Date: Mon, 4 Oct 1999 15:24:44 -0700 From: Hal Waite <halwaite @LVCM.COM> Subject: [Fwd: Radio Tango] This is a multi-part message in MIME format.


674F79EB146CEE9A5A1FCFD6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


674F79EB146CEE9A5A1FCFD6 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Disposition: inline Received: from pop3.lvcablemodem.com - 24.234.0.11 by lvcablemodem.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Mon, 4 Oct 1999 12:36:31 -0700 Return-Path: <greglindberg @yahoo.com> Received: from web703.mail.yahoo.com (web703.mail.yahoo.com [128.11.23.23]) by pop3.lvcablemodem.com with SMTP (MailShield v1.5); Mon, 04 Oct 1999 12:36:30 -0700 Message-ID: <19991004193300.8574.rocketmail @web703.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [200.32.85.221] by web703.mail.yahoo.com; Mon, 04 Oct 1999 12:33:00 PDT

Date: Mon, 4 Oct 1999 12:33:00 -0700 (PDT) From: Greg Lindberg <greglindberg @yahoo.com> Reply-To: greg @cubik.com Subject: Radio Tango To: halwaite @lvcm.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Hi, I got your email forwarded to me in Buenos Aires and I think I can help you out. I4ve recently moved the Radio Tango streams to another server so you may still be accessing the old ones. If you haven4t already done so, go to the www.radiotango.com site and access the new streams on the listen page (You should always go there first since the pls files can change) If it4s not working then clear your disk cache and try again (your browser may be caching the old pls files.) If that fails then use these IP addresses for the streams from within WinAmp: for DSL http://206.251.29.123:8000 and for modem http://205.251.29.123:8010. Please let me know if you have any more trouble and I4ll try and walk you through it. Also, could you please forward this to the Tango-L list, as I cannot send from my account in B.S. to the list. Suerte, Greg ===== __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Bid and sell for free at http://auctions.yahoo.com


674F79EB146CEE9A5A1FCFD6--


Date: Mon, 4 Oct 1999 15:29:35 -0700 From: Hal Waite <halwaite @LVCM.COM> Subject: Re: [ATOF] Popular culture and dance Christina Burtis wrote: > > He's definitely missing the point, Sergio. I loved your discussions on > Argentine culture, esp. the ones about piropos of course. I found it very VERY > relevant to the feeling of tango. Please keep them coming. > > Kind regards, > > Christina Burtis > (a.k.a. Melenita de Oro) > Washington D.C. I find that PC policemen seldom get the point and are humorless at best. Hal


Date: Tue, 5 Oct 1999 00:50:54 EDT From: Charles Roques <Crrtango @AOL.COM> Subject: Argentine "culture" re. piropos Yes, It is good to understand something about the culture that created tango but any one who has lived in Latin America can tell you that verbal flirting whether unsavory or "creative" is hardly indigenous to Argentina. It's pretty rampant all over the latin world. It's just a matter of whether you find it offensive or not. Perhaps a woman who finds it "charming" in Buenos Aires might not find it so in Santo Domingo. It's not a question of being politically correct, I just find it much more interesting to try to express these kind of feelings silently on the dance floor. Charles


Date: Tue, 5 Oct 1999 14:31:24 +0900 From: Sang Hyeon Chang <chang @BARAM.PHYS.TOHOKU.AC.JP> Subject: Re: Ebert review As far as I know, Ebert doesn't know much about tango, but he likes it. He gave thumbs up for both "Tango Lesson" and "Tango". For Tango Lesson, both Siskel and Ebert gave thumbs up. Ebert said that this is the first time ever he walked out of the screening and bought the soundtrack. (Guess how many films he saw for his life!) He just loved that musics and dances. After Siskel have passed away, one guest critic reviewed "Tango" with Ebert and he didn't like it. Ebert asked him "So, don't you like the dance?" "NO, I think tango is a stupid dance!" Oh, I never missed Siskel more than that moment. Anyway, here is another interesting opinion by Ebert in the review of "Tango Lesson" "Most dances are for people who are falling in love. The tango is a dance for those who have survived it, and are still a little angry about having their hearts so mishandled" Sang


End of TANGO-L Digest - 4 Oct 1999 to 5 Oct 1999 (#1999-25) ***********************************************************