[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [TANGO-L] Computer studies show that perhaps Argentine Tango might be the most energy effecient and natural way to dance...
- To: TANGO-L@MITVMA.MIT.EDU
- Subject: Re: [TANGO-L] Computer studies show that perhaps Argentine Tango might be the most energy effecient and natural way to dance...
- From: Derik Rawson <rawsonweb@YAHOO.COM>
- Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2006 11:15:22 -0800
- Comments: To: DANIEL IANNARELLI <daniel.iannarelli@btinternet.com>, d.rawson@rawsonweb.com
- Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
- Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=VaNT+jviktlkg0GgAzGJn0sHRJ3zAwlUApfApX71My9j837FKxlpb/ar6JkQmH8KOQHiMvx1ovl1uWKfEQI4luqmRgoqtfaN+152uyBfgvYtAuAdJzGTlOns5vMPFbb1CE7lyD/LcGAPSjC1hJhlPxv5kL7opRbg4fI3IB+p+/Y= ;
- In-reply-to: <20060103190857.47921.qmail@web86608.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
- Reply-to: d.rawson@rawsonweb.com
- Sender: Discussion of Any Aspect of the Argentine Tango <TANGO-L@MITVMA.MIT.EDU>
Dear Dani:
Only a cocoanut? ....lol.
Derik
d.rawson@rawsonweb.com
--- DANIEL IANNARELLI
<daniel.iannarelli@btinternet.com> wrote:
> Hmmm. . . let's not get too hasty. Let me think. . .
>
> Yes, I agree. All the scientific studies show that
> you are correct. You win a cocoanut!
> Dani
>
> Derik Rawson <rawsonweb@YAHOO.COM> wrote:
> Dear Dani:
>
> I think that you are right.... I mean what does the
> National Science Foundation or the Journal of Nature
> know about science? You obiviously know so much
> more..lol.
>
> Derik
> d.rawson@rawsonweb.com
>
> --- Dani Iannarelli
> wrote:
>
> > Wh-a-a-a-a-a-t a load of utter guff. . . !
> >
> >
> >
> > Dani
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > >Dear All:
> > >
> > >Thought that you might find this interesting.
> > Seems
> > >that the moves in Argentine Tango might be the
> most
> > >energy effecient and natural way to dance,
> because
> > >computer studies show that most effecient ways to
> > move
> > >are apparently..
> > >
> > >1. Walking (best for very slow speeds)
> > >2. Sliding forward without bobbing up and down
> > (best
> > >for intermediate speeds)
> > >3. Running (best for high speeds)
> > >
> > >Article below details computer studies.
> > >
> > >Derik
> > >
> >
> > nweb.com> d.rawson@rawsonweb.com
> > >
> > >***************
> > >Why We Walk and Run vs. Hopping and Skipping
> > >By LiveScience Staff
> > >
> > >posted: 15 September 2005
> > >01:36 pm ET
> > >
> > >"The computer simulations conclude that normal
> > walking
> > >is simply most energy efficient for travel at low
> > >speeds, and running is best at higher speeds.
> And,
> > >they report, a third walk-run gait is optimal for
> > >intermediate speeds, even though humans do not
> > appear
> > >to take advantage of it."
> > >
> > >Except Argentines....lol.
> >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________
> Yahoo! for Good - Make a difference this year.
> http://brand.yahoo.com/cybergivingweek2005/
>
>
>
__________________________________
Yahoo! for Good - Make a difference this year.
http://brand.yahoo.com/cybergivingweek2005/